Who invested in Well.ca

5 rounds we have observed, with the 9 investors named in them. Every figure came from a named source, and where the company reported a raise to the SEC itself, that is shown beside it.

Retail

Funding summaryUpdated 26 Oct 2026

$10Mraised across 5 rounds since 2008, from 5 sources

$425KSeed$1.1MSeries B$2.3MVenture$975KDebt$5.3MVenture

Latest round: Venture, $5.3MApr 2013
Step-upi: 5.4×
Investors: 9

See who backed them

The funding story

Each circle is a round, placed by date and sized by amount. The line above is the running total.

200820092010201120122013

$425KSeed$1.1MSeries B$2.3MVenture$975KDebt$5.3MVenture

First round: Seed, $425K
Biggest round: $5.3M
Usual gap between rounds: 16 months

The rounds

Apr 2013
Venture$5.3M1 new1 returning
- Inovia Capital
- Extreme Venture Partners
From a historical funding record
Dec 2012
Debt$975K1 new
- FedDev
From a historical funding record
Oct 2010
Venture$2.3M1 new1 returning
- Inovia Capital
- Thunder Road Capital
From a historical funding record
Jul 2009
Series B$1.1M4 new
- Thunder Road Capital
- Andrew Sloss
- David Ceolin
- Hilton Silberg
Reported by well.ca
Apr 2008
Seed$425K2 new
- Maple Leaf Angels
- Jim Estill
Reported by newswire.ca

Who was in which round

The busiest backers across the latest rounds. A filled square is a round they joined; a dark one, a round they led.

Seed2008Series B2009Venture2010Debt2012Venture2013

Inovia CapitalThunder Road Capital

FedDev

Extreme Venture Partners

Maple Leaf AngelsJim EstillAndrew SlossDavid CeolinHilton Silberg

Everyone who backed them

Inovia CapitalVC firm2rounds

Thunder Road CapitalInvestment firm2rounds

FedDevVC firm1round

Extreme Venture PartnersAccelerator1round

Maple Leaf AngelsAngel network1round

Jim EstillAngel1round

Andrew Slossno record of our own yet1round

David Ceolinno record of our own yet1round

Hilton Silbergno record of our own yet1round

Missing a round, or an investor who was in one? Tell us.

Also claim to have backed them

This firm lists Well.ca as a portfolio company on their own website, but no report of a round names it. They are the firms' own claims, kept apart from the rounds above.