Who invested in Dabble

5 rounds we have observed, with the 5 investors named in them. Every figure came from a named source, and where the company reported a raise to the SEC itself, that is shown beside it.

Media

Funding summaryUpdated 26 Oct 2026

$1.3Mraised across 5 rounds since 2006, from 5 sources

$350KSeed$145KSeed$458KRound$50KSeed$253KRound

Latest round: Round, $253KMay 2015
Biggest round: $458KRound · Oct 2012
Step-upi: 5.1×
Investors: 5

See who backed them

The funding story

Each circle is a round, placed by date and sized by amount. The line above is the running total.

20062008201020122014

$350KSeed$145KSeed$458KRound$50KSeed$253KRound

First round: Seed, $350K
Biggest round: $458K
Usual gap between rounds: 2.4 years

The rounds

May 2015
Round$253K4 new
- Pallasite Ventures
- Mark Tebbe
- Jeffrey Carter
- Jim Gray
From a historical funding record
Mar 2015
Seed$50K1 new
- Capital Innovators
From a historical funding record
Oct 2012
Round$458K
No investor was named in the report.
From a historical funding recordSEC filing: $145K sold, first sale May 2012
May 2012
Seed$145K
No investor was named in the report.
From a historical funding recordSEC filing: $145K sold, first sale May 2012
Jan 2006
Seed$350K
No investor was named in the report.
Reported by onlisareinsradar.com

Founders and team

From the SEC filings it signed: 2 on the team.

Jay SwobodaExecutive Officer, Directori
Jeff CarterDirector, Promoteri

Who was in which round

The busiest backers across the latest rounds. A filled square is a round they joined; a dark one, a round they led.

Seed2006Seed2012Round2012Seed2015Round2015

Capital Innovators

Pallasite VenturesMark TebbeJeffrey CarterJim Gray

Everyone who backed them

Capital InnovatorsAccelerator1round

Pallasite VenturesVC firm1round

Mark TebbeAngel1round

Jeffrey CarterVC firm1round

Jim Grayno record of our own yet1round

Missing a round, or an investor who was in one? Tell us.

Also claim to have backed them

These 3 firms list Dabble as a portfolio company on their own websites, but no report of a round names them. They are the firms' own claims, kept apart from the rounds above.