Investor Lists

Investors based in Santiago

Updated 7 November 2026

Firms with an address in Santiago. A head office is a fact about the firm; where it invests is on its own page.

86investors on the listNo change this week
27cheques in 12 months-17% against the market
$1.6Mmedian round they joined-79% against the market median
14%wrote a cheque in 12 months
7%have led a round

The Top 25

Ordered by cheques observed, never by anything anyone paid for

Deploying now (12)

  1. 1Start-Up ChilequietAccelerator · Chile737$40Kmedian roundAug 2015last seen
  2. 2Fen VenturesDeploying nowVC firm · Chile53$3.4Mmedian roundOct 2026last seen
  3. 3Nazca VenturesDeploying nowVC firm · Chile28$22Mmedian roundJul 2026last seen
  4. 4Angel Hub VenturesDeploying nowAngel network · Mexico7$1.1Mmedian roundMar 2026last seen
  5. 530N VenturesDeploying nowVC firm · Chile4$10Mmedian roundOct 2026last seen
  6. 6Daedalus VenturesquietVC firm · Chile3$21Mmedian roundDec 2024last seen
  7. 7Driven VCDeploying nowVC firm · Chile3$2Mmedian roundOct 2026last seen
  8. 8Impacta VCDeploying nowVC firm · Chile2$525Kmedian roundFeb 2026last seen
  9. 9Tantauco VenturesDeploying nowVC firm · Chile2$1.6Mmedian roundJun 2026last seen
  10. 10Taram CapitalDeploying nowVC firm · Chile2$6.2Mmedian roundOct 2026last seen
  11. 11Alza GroupDeploying nowInvestment firm · Chile1$900Kmedian roundSept 2026last seen
  12. 12Carozzi VenturesDeploying nowVC firm · Chile1$1Mmedian roundNov 2025last seen
  13. 13ConsorcioquietVC firm · Chile1$1Mmedian roundApr 2025last seen
  14. 14DadneoDeploying nowCorporate VC · Chile1$1.1Mmedian roundSept 2026last seen
  15. 15Gerens CapitalquietVC firm · Chile1$4Mmedian roundJun 2012last seen
  16. 16NextperiencequietVC firm · Chile1$25Kmedian roundSept 2012last seen
  17. 17Punto Cero VenturesquietVC firm · Chile1$1.7Mmedian roundJun 2025last seen
  18. 18VeterquímicaDeploying nowInvestment firm · Chile1$1Mmedian roundNov 2025last seen
  19. 19ZentynelquietVC firm · Chile1$2.5Mmedian roundOct 2024last seen
  20. 201947 RiseunknownVC firm · Chilenone observed-median round-last seen
  21. 21AMB InvestmentsunknownInvestment firm · Chilenone observed-median round-last seen
  22. 22AMM CapitalunknownInvestment firm · Chilenone observed-median round-last seen
  23. 23Activa Alternative AssetsunknownInvestment firm · Chilenone observed-median round-last seen
  24. 24Activa Private EquityunknownPrivate equity · Chilenone observed-median round-last seen
  25. 25Add Ventures CapitalunknownVC firm · Chilenone observed-median round-last seen
61 more on this list

All 86 are in the app, with filters for stage, sector and market. A free account shows 10 per search, Pro up to 1,000.

See the whole list →

Quick answers about investors based in Santiago

Who are the most active investors based in Santiago?

By cheques observed, the most active are Start-Up Chile, Fen Ventures, Nazca Ventures, Angel Hub Ventures and 30N Ventures.

How many investors based in Santiago are there?

86 are on record. 14% made an investment in the last 12 months and 7% have led a round.

Which stages do investors based in Santiago back?

Of the rounds with a named stage in the last 12 months, mostly Seed (60%) and Series A (33%).

How big are the rounds investors based in Santiago join?

The typical (median) round among the leading investors here is $1.6M.

Which sectors do investors based in Santiago back most?

In the last 12 months, mostly AI, Fintech and B2B.

Which investors based in Santiago lead the most rounds?

Nazca Ventures (1 led), Impacta VC (1 led) and Taram Capital (1 led).

What have investors based in Santiago invested in recently?

Recent rounds include Celes (Series A, Oct 2026, with 30N Ventures), FinMaq (Series A, Oct 2026, with 30N Ventures) and Dapta (Seed, Oct 2026, with Fen Ventures).

How is this list of investors based in Santiago ranked?

By cheques observed, from the rounds and filings we watched, and never by anything anyone paid for. It is rebuilt every night.

Built from the rounds we watched, refreshed every night. How we count · Report a correction